ONLINE AGE

(Online version of the Arunachal Age newspaper)

Home / Editorial / Don’t rebrand a sporting legacy

Don’t rebrand a sporting legacy

Hockey India (HI)’s decision to swap blue for saffron on the team jerseys in the upcoming FIH World Cup in Belgium and the Netherlands lacks any real justification beyond saffron being the ruling establishment’s political colour. The federation’s primary argument that blue jerseys blur into the blue synthetic turf, creating visibility issues, doesn’t hold up. The blue turf has been standard in field hockey for more than a decade, and Indian players have done well on it, winning bronze medals in the Olympic Games in 2020 and 2024, while wearing blue. Notably, the decision has not been communicated along with credible evidence for the contrast between kit colours and the playing surface influencing player performance or visibility. The manner in which the colour switch was effected raises valid questions about the political objectives behind the move.

Former players and administrators have criticised the decision, even as the federation faces charges of aiding a push to saffronise the sport. Viren Rasquinha, former India captain, called the move “embarrassing”, asserting that blue is always linked to the team’s legacy and identity. The most striking voice of dissent came from within the official fold, with HI president and former India captain Dilip Tirkey saying federation office-bearers were informed about the decision only a few hours before the jerseys were unveiled. The president seeking an explanation from the HI Director-General on this matter deepens concerns about the institutional processes followed. He reportedly wrote in an official communication that the larger issue was about decision-making – about a change involving one of Indian hockey’s “most recognisable” symbols. However, HI secretary Bhola Nath Singh has maintained that all officials were informed about this change.

The federation has justified the colour change, citing feedback from the players and coaches. The official clarification has pointed to requests made by the players and coaches in connection with a visual overlap caused by the blue jerseys on the blue turf, necessitating a change in the kit’s colour.  It has also noted the significance of saffron, which represents courage and strength in the national flag. However, these arguments fail to justify altering a long-standing sporting legacy. For decades, the blue jersey has defined Indian hockey. The team wore blue when they brought home multiple titles – the colour has been integral to a sporting identity, affirmed in expressions such as “Men in Blue”. Any decision to disregard this cherished tradition sets a concerning precedent. (Source: DH)

Share:

More Posts

Send Us A Message

RELATED ARTICLES