The legislation authorises US President Donald Trump to impose tariffs of up to 100% on countries such as India and China for buying Russian oil. The External Affairs Ministry said the Bill could have implications for bilateral ties and asserted that India will take all necessary measures to protect its trade and economic interests. The government said it is “firmly committed to ensuring energy security for its 1.4 billion people through diversified sourcing” and will work closely with industry bodies to mitigate the fallout. The statement also flagged the Bill’s impact on global energy markets.  The Trump administration has weaponised tariffs against other countries, including allies, to serve its own ends. India has faced such measures before, and its responses were cautious and carefully worded to avoid offence, even attempting to placate the US for fear of escalation.

With the trade deal under negotiation, the US a major partner, a large Indian diaspora in the US, and a strong security relationship, New Delhi may have felt compelled to tread lightly. But, the Trump administration has shown little regard for policy stability or niceties, preferring to dictate terms with arrogance and an assumed right to lead the world and impose its will on others, right or wrong. The proposal to punish other countries for buying oil from Russia is a flagrant violation of international norms and conduct. If Russia attacked Ukraine, why should other countries be blamed and made to pay the price? Ironically, this is being done when the US has attacked Iran and is waging a war with bigger consequences for the world, and has exempted itself from the working of the new law.

For the last many decades, the US has been among the world’s biggest aggressors and violators of international laws. The Graham Bill is not an aberration; it had bipartisan support in Congress and is US law now. India should stand its ground and refuse to succumb to US pressure and blackmail. It has clearly articulated the implications and consequences of the US move. It should stick to the words and protect its interests. If there is no resistance, it can lead to more pressure and demands. (Source: DH)